Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video919 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food Scarcity results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 408 hits. Analysis detected 2,905 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,757 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (4,496 of 16,562 topics). This Food Scarcity is worse (more manipulative) than 72.90% of the peer group.
Food Scarcity
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,757
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

73% percentile
025507510072.9% percentile
4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.8%10.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 11.8%11.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 10.3%10.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 14.8%14.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 11.5%11.5%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 11.8%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.4%Composition/Division: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos