Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Food Safety Regulations results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hindsight Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 269 hits . Analysis detected 1,236 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,058 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 15,769 topics). This Food Safety Regulations is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Food Safety Regulations
Topic details
Total words: 2,058
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 13.1% 13.1% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Hindsight Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% Middle Ground: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.1% Burden of Proof: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.4% Personal Incredulity: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.2% Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst