Topic summary
⁠22%2 analyzed articles/videos276 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food Assistance Programs results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 359 hits. Analysis detected 3,774 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,196 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (8,930 of 15,447 topics). This Food Assistance Programs is better (less manipulative) than 57.80% of the peer group.
Food Assistance Programs
Topic details
Total words: 4,196
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

42% percentile
025507510042.2% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.6%8.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.2%8.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.1%6.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.7%2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.7%4.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos