Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,962 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food And Farming results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Anecdotal, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 882 hits. Analysis detected 4,734 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,848 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (13,929 of 16,562 topics). This Food And Farming is better (less manipulative) than 84.10% of the peer group.
Food And Farming
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,848
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

16% percentile
025507510015.9% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.8%2.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos