Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,058 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food And Drinks results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 26.8% saturation with 849 hits. Analysis detected 8,174 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,169 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (2,884 of 16,562 topics). This Food And Drinks is worse (more manipulative) than 82.60% of the peer group.
Food And Drinks
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,169
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

83% percentile
025507510082.6% percentile
6.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 26.8%26.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 16.5%16.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 11.2%11.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 14.0%14.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 11.7%11.7%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 10.2%10.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 23.7%, sitewide 26.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 26.8%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 21.9%, sitewide 19.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 11.2%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 4.0%Halo Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Bandwagon: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 2.2%Tu Quoque: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 0.2%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos