Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video378 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Foldable Smartphones results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 22.2% saturation with 336 hits. Analysis detected 1,581 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,512 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (3,731 of 16,562 topics). This Foldable Smartphones is worse (more manipulative) than 77.50% of the peer group.
Foldable Smartphones
Topic details
Total words: 1,512
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

78% percentile
025507510077.5% percentile
5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 22.2%22.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.6%3.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 13.4%13.4%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 7.4%7.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.8%1.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Topic 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 22.2%, sitewide 4.6%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 1.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 4.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.8%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Composition/Division: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos