Topic summary
⁠83%2 analyzed articles/videos1,052 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Foia Requests results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29.9% saturation with 1,064 hits. Analysis detected 6,523 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,557 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (3,341 of 16,311 topics). This Foia Requests is worse (more manipulative) than 79.50% of the peer group.
Foia Requests
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,557
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

80% percentile
025507510079.5% percentile
5.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 29.9%29.9%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 22.5%22.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.9%12.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 28.9%28.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.8%6.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 11.4%11.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 29.9%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 28.9%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 22.5%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 18.2%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Begging the Question: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos