Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos292 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Focus results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 24.7% saturation with 288 hits. Analysis detected 2,206 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,168 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠92% (1,323 of 16,562 topics). This Focus is worse (more manipulative) than 92.00% of the peer group.
Focus
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,168
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

92% percentile
025507510092.0% percentile
9.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 24.5%24.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 21.9%21.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 18.5%18.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.8%4.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.8%6.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.8%15.8%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 5.5%5.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 7.0%7.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 24.7%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 24.5%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 21.9%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 18.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.8%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Composition/Division: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos