Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video611 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Flower Sales results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 233 hits. Analysis detected 1,675 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,444 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (8,256 of 16,562 topics). This Flower Sales is worse (more manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group.
Flower Sales
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,444
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510050.2% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.1%0.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 9.5%9.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.5%1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.4%8.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Personal Incredulity: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.5%Composition/Division: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos