Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,075 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Float Building results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 20.6% saturation with 662 hits. Analysis detected 3,773 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,221 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (4,819 of 16,451 topics). This Float Building is worse (more manipulative) than 70.70% of the peer group.
Float Building
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,221
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

71% percentile
025507510070.7% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 20.6%20.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.5%7.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.7%15.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 15.2%15.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.3%8.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.6%12.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 26.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 20.6%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos