Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 3,347 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fitness Tech results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Indoctrination , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 1,394 hits . Analysis detected 6,499 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,388 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 6% (15,563 of 16,562 topics). This Fitness Tech is better (less manipulative) than 94.00% of the peer group. Fitness Tech
Topic details
Total words: 13,388
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.0% percentile 1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles13.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 0.5% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst