Topic summary
22%1 analyzed article/video1,410 analyzed words
BS Summary: These First Responder Mental Health results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Indoctrination, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 314 hits. Analysis detected 1,886 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,230 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (12,570 of 15,878 topics). This First Responder Mental Health is better (less manipulative) than 79.20% of the peer group.
First Responder Mental Health
Topic details
Total words: 4,230
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

21% percentile
025507510020.8% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.4%7.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos