Topic summary
⁠51%1 analyzed article/video1,047 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fire Services results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Framing Effect, and Ad Hominem, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 5.4% saturation with 225 hits. Analysis detected 1,970 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,188 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (16,556 of 23,003 topics). This Fire Services is better (less manipulative) than 72.00% of the peer group.
Fire Services
Topic details
Total words: 4,188
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

28% percentile
025507510028.0% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Straw Man: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos