Publication summary
17% 13 analyzed articles/videos 6,448 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Creative Loafing Tampa results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 3.9% saturation with 1,122 hits . Analysis detected 11,643 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,434 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 18% (463 of 564 publications). This Creative Loafing Tampa is better (less manipulative) than 82.10% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 28,434
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.9% percentile 0.9% BS Score13 analyzed articles28.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst