Topic summary
⁠19%3 analyzed articles/videos3,669 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fintech results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 1,395 hits. Analysis detected 9,207 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,893 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠12% (14,726 of 16,562 topics). This Fintech is better (less manipulative) than 88.90% of the peer group.
Fintech
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 12,893
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

11% percentile
025507510011.1% percentile
1.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles12.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 10.8%10.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos