Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,465 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Finland results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Halo Effect, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 492 hits. Analysis detected 3,015 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,395 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (11,422 of 16,562 topics). This Finland is better (less manipulative) than 69.00% of the peer group.
Finland
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,395
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

31% percentile
025507510031.0% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.4%6.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 11.2%11.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos