Topic summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video1,293 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Financiamiento De La Investigacion results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 18.8% saturation with 731 hits. Analysis detected 4,650 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,879 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (5,952 of 15,414 topics). This Financiamiento De La Investigacion is worse (more manipulative) than 61.40% of the peer group.
Financiamiento De La Investigacion
Topic details
Total words: 3,879
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

61% percentile
025507510061.4% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.7%13.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 18.9%18.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.0%13.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.6%11.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.6%2.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 18.9%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.4%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos