Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video445 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Financial Wellness results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Pessimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 323 hits. Analysis detected 1,743 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,780 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (6,295 of 16,559 topics). This Financial Wellness is worse (more manipulative) than 62.00% of the peer group.
Financial Wellness
Topic details
Total words: 1,780
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510062.0% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.4%7.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 10.5%10.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.1%6.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 7.9%7.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.5%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Composition/Division: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos