Topic summary
⁠84%3 analyzed articles/videos289 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Financial Technology results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 619 hits. Analysis detected 4,243 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,673 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (7,059 of 16,124 topics). This Financial Technology is worse (more manipulative) than 56.20% of the peer group.
Financial Technology
Topic details
Total words: 3,673
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510056.2% percentile
3.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 16.9%16.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.7%16.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 8.8%8.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.7%6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.0%3.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 16.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Straw Man: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos