Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Financial Status results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Biased Writer Voice , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 352 hits . Analysis detected 1,796 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,764 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 15,455 topics). This Financial Status is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Financial Status
Topic details
Total words: 1,764
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 15.5% 15.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 14.5% 14.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 19.9% 19.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 14.1% 14.1% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 19.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 15.5%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% Burden of Proof: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst