Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video907 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Financial Mismanagement results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Hindsight Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 589 hits. Analysis detected 2,573 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,628 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (11,397 of 16,562 topics). This Financial Mismanagement is better (less manipulative) than 68.80% of the peer group.
Financial Mismanagement
Topic details
Total words: 3,628
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

31% percentile
025507510031.2% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.0%5.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 16.2%16.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 16.2%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.3%Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos