Topic summary
⁠3%1 analyzed article/video466 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Financial Assistance results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Unattributed Quote, and Special Pleading, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 3.6% saturation with 68 hits. Analysis detected 222 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,864 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (16,920 of 22,956 topics). This Financial Assistance is better (less manipulative) than 73.70% of the peer group.
Financial Assistance
Topic details
Total words: 1,864
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

26% percentile
025507510026.3% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Topic 1.2%1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Special Pleading: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos