Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,550 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Filipino Cuisine results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Biased Writer Voice, and Anecdotal, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 748 hits. Analysis detected 5,074 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,200 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (9,742 of 15,769 topics). This Filipino Cuisine is better (less manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group.
Filipino Cuisine
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,200
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

38% percentile
025507510038.2% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 11.9%11.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 12.1%12.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos