Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video105 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fifa Men's World Cup Tournament results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 52.6% saturation with 221 hits. Analysis detected 953 faulty-reasoning hits from 420 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 22.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠99% (160 of 16,562 topics). This Fifa Men's World Cup Tournament is worse (more manipulative) than 99.00% of the peer group.
Fifa Men's World Cup Tournament

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

99% percentile
025507510099.0% percentile
22.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles420 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 51.9%51.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 35.2%35.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 52.6%52.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 36.7%36.7%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.9%6.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 13.8%13.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 7.6%7.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 6.9%6.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 52.6%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 51.9%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 36.7%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 35.2%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 0.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos