Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Fifa Ethics results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Authority, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 483 hits. Analysis detected 4,415 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,751 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,784 topics). This Fifa Ethics is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Fifa Ethics
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,751
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.4%8.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.0%8.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.0%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos