Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video428 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fiction In Translation results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Overconfidence Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 105 hits. Analysis detected 253 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,284 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (10,234 of 16,562 topics). This Fiction In Translation is better (less manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

38% percentile
025507510038.2% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.2%8.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.7%2.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.3%2.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos