Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Fertilizer Prices results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Availability Heuristic , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 296 hits . Analysis detected 1,401 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,840 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Fertilizer Prices is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Fertilizer Prices
Topic details
Total words: 1,840
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 16.1% 16.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 16.1%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 4.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Special Pleading: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.3% Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst