Topic summary
⁠38%1 analyzed article/video674 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Feeding Our Future results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 317 hits. Analysis detected 1,523 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,022 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (4,646 of 16,237 topics). This Feeding Our Future is worse (more manipulative) than 71.40% of the peer group.
Feeding Our Future
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠72%Feeding Our Future (selected)5%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,022
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

71% percentile
025507510071.4% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.8%10.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.7%8.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.7%5.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 15.2%15.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 3.5%3.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos