Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video893 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federalism And Technology results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Framing Effect, and Begging the Question, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 265 hits. Analysis detected 1,697 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,679 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (8,099 of 16,562 topics). This Federalism And Technology is worse (more manipulative) than 51.10% of the peer group.
Federalism And Technology
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠52%Federalism And Technology (selected)4%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,679
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510051.1% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 9.9%9.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.8%0.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 6.0%6.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Begging the Question: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.7%Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos