Topic summary
⁠65%2 analyzed articles/videos1,066 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Burden of Proof, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 304 hits. Analysis detected 2,633 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,198 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (8,003 of 16,562 topics). This Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure is worse (more manipulative) than 51.70% of the peer group.
Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure
Topic details
Total words: 3,198
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510051.7% percentile
3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.5%9.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.0%6.0%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 7.5%7.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.6%8.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 7.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 0.4%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos