Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,553 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Prosecutions results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 900 hits. Analysis detected 4,328 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,212 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (8,934 of 16,562 topics). This Federal Prosecutions is better (less manipulative) than 53.90% of the peer group.
Federal Prosecutions
Topic details
Total words: 6,212
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510046.1% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.5%14.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.2%11.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.5%3.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Straw Man: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%No True Scotsman: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos