Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,098 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Judges results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 41% saturation with 1,801 hits. Analysis detected 8,850 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,392 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (3,971 of 16,562 topics). This Federal Judges is worse (more manipulative) than 76.00% of the peer group.
Federal Judges
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,392
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

76% percentile
025507510076.0% percentile
5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 41.0%41.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 22.5%22.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.6%15.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.3%9.3%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 10.3%10.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.4%8.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 14.6%14.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 41.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 22.5%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Straw Man: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 0.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos