Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos2,087 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Government results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 25.7% saturation with 1,971 hits. Analysis detected 15,125 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,673 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (4,755 of 15,690 topics). This Federal Government is worse (more manipulative) than 69.70% of the peer group.
Federal Government
Topic details
Total words: 7,673
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510069.7% percentile
4.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 11.0%11.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 11.2%11.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.5%10.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.1%3.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 4.7%4.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 22.2%22.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 25.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 22.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos