Topic summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video139 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Fiscal & Tax Policy results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Anchoring Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31.4% saturation with 131 hits. Analysis detected 618 faulty-reasoning hits from 417 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠96% (695 of 16,562 topics). This Federal Fiscal & Tax Policy is worse (more manipulative) than 95.80% of the peer group.
Federal Fiscal & Tax Policy
Topic details
Total words: 417
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

96% percentile
025507510095.8% percentile
13.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles417 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 31.4%31.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 20.6%20.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 14.6%14.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 12.0%12.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 28.8%28.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 7.9%7.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.0%12.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 7.9%7.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 31.4%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 28.8%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 20.6%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 7.9%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos