Topic summary
⁠32%3 analyzed articles/videos2,198 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Education Policy results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 1,364 hits. Analysis detected 7,156 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,792 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (11,512 of 16,562 topics). This Federal Education Policy is better (less manipulative) than 69.50% of the peer group.
Federal Education Policy
Topic details
Total words: 8,792
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

31% percentile
025507510030.5% percentile
2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 7.2%7.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 2.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos