Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,001 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Drug Case results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 247 hits. Analysis detected 1,547 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,003 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (12,382 of 16,562 topics). This Federal Drug Case is better (less manipulative) than 74.80% of the peer group.
Federal Drug Case
Topic details
Total words: 3,003
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

25% percentile
025507510025.2% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.2%8.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Composition/Division: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos