Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,934 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Court Ruling results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 1,030 hits. Analysis detected 9,500 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,892 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (7,047 of 16,562 topics). This Federal Court Ruling is worse (more manipulative) than 57.50% of the peer group.
Federal Court Ruling
Topic details
Total words: 6,892
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510057.5% percentile
3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.9%14.9%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 12.8%12.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.4%10.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.2%9.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.6%8.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.4%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Bandwagon: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos