Topic summary
ā 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Federal Appointments results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Appeal to Emotion , and Politically Right Leaning Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 276 hits . Analysis detected 1,309 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,496 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ā 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Federal Appointments is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Federal Appointments
Topic details
Total words: 1,496
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 18.4% 18.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Politically Right Leaningā¦ Sitewide 1.4% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.4% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Circular Reasoning: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.1% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Indoctrination: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.9% Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst