Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video585 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fdny Response results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 405 hits. Analysis detected 1,305 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,340 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (9,407 of 16,562 topics). This Fdny Response is better (less manipulative) than 56.80% of the peer group.
Fdny Response
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,340
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510043.2% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.2%9.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.0%1.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos