Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video78 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fda Leadership results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 51% saturation with 159 hits. Analysis detected 954 faulty-reasoning hits from 312 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 25.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠100% (123 of 16,562 topics). This Fda Leadership is worse (more manipulative) than 99.30% of the peer group.
Fda Leadership
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 312
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

99% percentile
025507510099.3% percentile
25.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles312 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 50.0%50.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 45.2%45.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 51.0%51.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 36.2%36.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 30.1%30.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 47.8%47.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 15.1%15.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.1%6.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 6.1%6.1%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 6.1%6.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Topic 51.0%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 50.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 47.8%, sitewide 26.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 45.2%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 36.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 30.1%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.1%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.4%Horn Effect: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.0%Indoctrination: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos