Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Father Son Relationship results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 475 hits. Analysis detected 2,033 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,248 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Father Son Relationship is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Father Son Relationship
Topic details
Total words: 4,248
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.0%11.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 11.2%11.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos