Topic summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 1,824 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fatal Accidents results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 1,786 hits . Analysis detected 11,351 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,572 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 25% (12,435 of 16,562 topics). This Fatal Accidents is better (less manipulative) than 75.10% of the peer group. Fatal Accidents
Topic details
Total words: 12,572
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.9% percentile 2.1% BS Score5 analyzed articles12.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.6% 10.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.0% 10.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Red Herring: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst