Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos639 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fast Food Industry results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 36.4% saturation with 698 hits. Analysis detected 3,459 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,917 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (1,946 of 16,562 topics). This Fast Food Industry is worse (more manipulative) than 88.30% of the peer group.
Fast Food Industry
Topic details
Total words: 1,917
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

88% percentile
025507510088.3% percentile
7.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 36.4%36.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 11.3%11.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 33.3%33.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 8.9%8.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 9.2%9.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Topic 36.4%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Topic 33.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 11.3%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Recency Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos