Topic summary
⁠17%1 analyzed article/video378 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fast Casual Dining results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Halo Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 224 hits. Analysis detected 673 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,512 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (9,814 of 23,184 topics). This Fast Casual Dining is worse (more manipulative) than 57.70% of the peer group.
Fast Casual Dining
Topic details
Total words: 1,512
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510057.7% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 14.8%14.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 4.2%4.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.2%Composition/Division: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos