Topic summary
81%1 analyzed article/video1,011 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Farmworkers results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 461 hits. Analysis detected 2,151 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,033 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 41% (9,911 of 16,562 topics). This Farmworkers is better (less manipulative) than 59.80% of the peer group.
Farmworkers
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,033
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

40% percentile
025507510040.2% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.3%11.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 15.2%15.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Composition/Division: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Red Herring: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos