Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video770 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fares results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 32.5% saturation with 750 hits. Analysis detected 4,654 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,310 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (2,141 of 16,562 topics). This Fares is worse (more manipulative) than 87.10% of the peer group.
Fares
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,310
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

87% percentile
025507510087.1% percentile
7.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 32.5%32.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 20.2%20.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 29.2%29.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 13.9%13.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 10.0%10.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 13.1%13.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 8.1%8.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Topic 32.5%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Topic 29.2%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 25.6%, sitewide 26.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 20.2%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Bandwagon: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Personal Incredulity: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Begging the Question: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.6%AnecdotalSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos