Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video2,568 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Far Right Fear Mongering results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Hasty Generalization, and False Dilemma, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 547 hits. Analysis detected 4,761 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,704 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (13,129 of 16,562 topics). This Far Right Fear Mongering is better (less manipulative) than 79.30% of the peer group.
Far Right Fear Mongering
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠21%Far Right Fear Mongering (selected)2%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 7,704
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

21% percentile
025507510020.7% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.7%2.7%Politically Left Leaning 
Sitewide 2.0%Topic 6.3%6.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos