Topic summary
⁠55%2 analyzed articles/videos1,027 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fantasy Films results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Halo Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 1,102 hits. Analysis detected 4,425 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,018 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (12,051 of 21,970 topics). This Fantasy Films is better (less manipulative) than 54.90% of the peer group.
Fantasy Films
Topic details
Total words: 6,018
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510045.1% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 18.3%18.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos