Topic summary
⁠48%3 analyzed articles/videos2,227 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fan Engagement results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 1,486 hits. Analysis detected 11,993 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,896 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (11,415 of 16,562 topics). This Fan Engagement is better (less manipulative) than 68.90% of the peer group.
Fan Engagement
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 12,896
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

31% percentile
025507510031.1% percentile
2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles12.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 11.5%11.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos