Topic summary
⁠68%1 analyzed article/video959 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fan Activism results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Indoctrination, and In-Group Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 313 hits. Analysis detected 2,459 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,836 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (14,913 of 24,114 topics). This Fan Activism is better (less manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group.
Fan Activism
Topic details
Total words: 3,836
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

38% percentile
025507510038.2% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.9%5.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos